From http://41.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lmedsf 7SQ81qaz1ado1_500.jpg |
Director: Alain Resnais
Screenplay: Alain Robbe-Grillet
Actors: Delphine Seyrig; Giorgio
Albertazzi; Sacha Pitoëff
94 minutes
Synopsis: In a hotel, a man named
X (Giorgio Albertazzi) tells a woman
called A (Delphine Seyrig) that they
met the year before and have been in an adulterous relationship away from her husband
M (Sacha Pitoëff). A denies this as their
reality continually distorts and the figures in the hotel's halls occasionally
freeze in time.
From https://ktismatics.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/marienbad-pistols.png |
Last Year At Marienbad, despite being firmly part of the European
art cinema that would be dominant in the sixties, is still very unique besides
them. It shows the elliptical nature of many of these films, the
experimentation, the existentialism, and for those who despised these films, an
absence of surface level "entertainment", but the result is bold in
its execution even compared to the more bolder experiments of the era like Jean-Luc Godard's films. Films like ...Marienbad are
"entertaining" to me for their experimentation, and melodrama is
still there in these films only in bitterer and more post-modern forms. ...Marienbad is one of the few openly
puzzle-like entries of the French New Wave, others I've seen even if they were
unconventional in structure still retaining a clear narrative guideline or a
clear theme. ...Marienbad is
inherently disorientation, the meeting of a bold experimental film maker in Resnais meeting a bold author of
experimental literature in Robbe-Grillet.
Large portions are a horror film
in the robbing of its characters of control. X at times shows the ability to
manipulate the film to his desires as the narrator, altering the world in his
own image, but when his memory slips or brutality steps in he is powerless. A
film of an unbroken, fluctuating dream, it traps its characters in an illusion.
The difficulty one can find with such presentation can be lightened when you
picture the scenes in the context, to paraphrase Kurt Vonnegut, of the characters being unstuck in time. The only
clear, tangible thing is the hotel the drama takes place in, set around the
1920s or so, and that there has likely been an act of adultery or unfaithfulness
even if nothing has been committed physically or X is merely trying to
instigate a fictional one. It's not out-of-place to reference Stanley Kubrick's The Shining (1980) - if Kubrick's
story is about a family being haunted by the ghosts in the hotel they are staying
in, ...Marienbad be it about ghosts
who are already dead or living statues being haunted by their never-ceasing
cycles. A stasis is felt with amnesia effecting X eventually as much as for A.
A horror film is apt as a description as, while it is depicted in beautiful
monochrome by cinematography Sacha Vierny,
the bearings of what ever happened if anything, or even if there was a last
year, is less and less clear as the film goes along. As the film distorts its
timeframe, various events are evoked subtly in the editing and shifts between
locations and periods that show the worse scenarios that could happen,
including sexual violence, that horrifies X and A equally.
From https://ktismatics.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/marienbad-mirror.png |
It's redundant and irritating to
merely view ...Marienbad as an "arty
film", art for art's sake without emotional connection. The drama is
varying depending on the viewer but there. Clues of the situation are there.
The game played continually that X keeps losing to M suggests an inevitability
of fate that will undermine X the same way as will happen to Max Von Sydow playing chess with the
Grim Reaper. The duplication of a specific object pulls the film into science
fiction and also shows the endlessness of this reality onscreen that X tries to
break, though he is as much into question as scenes show him as being as
monstrous to his own horror as he is in love with A sincerely. ...Marienbad is different to other
films that share these themes and concepts because it doesn't placate to simple
little treats for the viewer to indulge in which even terrible movies can
replicate, entertaining or not. There is no cheap sentiment, no dumb laughs or
anything easy for even a dreadful film to be able to achieve well. With ...Marienbad one has to work, but most
of the work is accepting that it has no clear narrative end, left a mystery,
and that its use of editing and tone will have to settled with at first.
From https://ishootthepictures.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/ vlcsnap-2010-07-05-15h22m13s199.png |
Technical Detail:
Vital to the success of ...Marienbad is the location, shot with
two German castles and French studio sets to make up the one looming environment,
with its perfect symmetrical garden and elaborate decor, that becomes as much
part of the puzzle of the narrative chunks. It is a literal labyrinth with no
sense of true geography, a flux of rooms and corridors that could easily switch
places. Corridors blur with other corridors and the scale overwhelms the
individuals perpetually in evening suits and gowns. The cinematography by Vierny ground these despondent locations
into one single, workable whole. It is exceptional, both in the visuals and the
use of long camera pans, the camera as much a visitor inside the hotel lost
between the characters. The locations themselves in their decoration, from the
statues to floral carvings, bring a viewer to a level of aesthetic joy but
there is a stilted decay, obsoleteness, to it all in the extravagance that is
choking. As with the figures within these sets, awkward and straight-jacketed
in their arch mannerisms and performances, this decor becomes a suffocating
environment felt by the viewer too as it follows the camera.
The editing is also absolutely
vital for the film's puzzle structure to allow ...Marienbad to work as the elusive film it is. Flashbacks
intermingle with flash forwards, and time takes place in various forms at the
same time as the character suddenly appear in one place to another in the same
spots. Editing alongside the camera is one of the most important tools of
cinema, its use and absence, if my amateur education in cinema has taught me
anything. Films like this show why, with editors Jasmine Chasney and Henri
Colpi perfect in constructive what was needed for Resnais and Robbe-Grillet's
cinematic game. Interestingly Robbe-Grillet
put many directorial and camera instructions in the script, which would be seen
as taboo in any other circumstance like in modern mainstream cinema, but Resnais followed the instructions
faithfully only adding his own touches including in areas not considered in the
screenplay. The result is the marriage of two strong auteurist voices supported
by talented individuals working on their puzzle. Out of both figures, Robbe-Grillet's films when he decided to
become a director soon after would run with the same manipulations of time and
identity biting at the extremes of this one.
The music, which intermingles
classical and modernist compositions, stimulates further intensity to the
material. Especially with the organ heard numerous times throughout this is the
score of a horror film, its jarring nature against the compositions implicating
audibly the trap the participants are in.
From http://images1.laweekly.com/imager/last-year-at-marienbad /u/original/5420061/marienbad.jpg |
Abstract Spectrum: Abstract / Expressionist
Abstract Rating (High/Medium/Low/None):
High
The ending resounds with an
attempt to escape the hotel and the film's structure itself. The issue is,
however, whether this escape is at all possible or if the overlaying repetition
will start from the beginning again with X and A in their original places, like
pieces in an elaborate board game or a toy construction. The results of each
previous event has led to tragedy only to start again. It is only because the
film itself ends that we don't see if anyone has escaped permanently.
But the film can be interpreted another
way, and far from a cop-out, this deliberate lack of a clear meaning is
powerful, because the idea is the hotel itself stuck in a time bubble, the
outcome depending on the viewer as if they were in it as participants themselves.
The conflict in the film is shown poignantly when X and A discuss, as X
narrates, a pair of statues in the garden, the male protecting the woman or the
woman pointing out a distant object or both. Like these statues its actively
encouraged by the editing and chronological distortions to see scenes in
multiple ways. My opinion of what ends the plot could be different from yours,
and that is not problematic because the film is designed, like for the
characters, for all viewers engaged with the film to appear back out of it
through different "corridors" and exits. The result has never been
replicated from any film I've seen yet and it'd take a one-off like ...Marienbad to be its mirror. The Shining comes off as its more genre
based blood sibling with different intentions. Robbe-Grillet's own films from the few I've seen don't reach this
level of abstraction but work their own grooves. David Lynch's INLAND EMPIRE
(2006) is the closest thing and is a film few will be patient with as with ...Marienbad.
From http://screencrave.com/wp-content/uploads/2013 /06/Last-Year-at-Marienbad-Jaime-2-June-2013.jpg |
Personal Opinion:
Is there entertainment is the
film considering how its described? Yes, as a depiction of an endless fluctuating
maze. Horror films dabble with mazes and endless cycles, but ...Marienbad has the most dreamlike and
effecting. So do fantasy and science fiction movies connect to the film. If a
genre is to be attempted haphazardly to be placed on the film, it's at least
existential and opulent. A story of beings trapped in a labyrinth of time, a
film of a film itself in conflict with itself. Far from navel gazing this is
willing to have the film pull itself to pieces and while there is a way to
interpret the theme as about cinema, it also works in the context of a person
existing in deathless ennui, drifting through corridors not sure where they
were the year before. Its only not entertainment if one comes into Last Year At Marienbad expecting a romantic
comedy or Steven Seagal to appear amongst the living statues, but the DVD cover
at least on my copy should warn you neither of the following appear anyway.
Befittingly, this puzzle has a cameo from the Master on the right. (From http://scrapheap.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Marienbad-1.jpeg) |
No comments:
Post a Comment