Showing posts with label Director: Alain Robbe-Grillet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Director: Alain Robbe-Grillet. Show all posts

Friday, 12 May 2023

Trans-Europ-Express (1966)

 


Director: Alain Robbe-Grillet

Screenplay: Alain Robbe-Grillet

Cast: Jean-Louis Trintignant as Elias; Marie-France Pisier as Eva; Christian Barbier as Lorentz; Charles Millot as Franck; Daniel Emilfork as policeman; Henri Lambert as police inspector; Alain Robbe-Grillet as Jean, the film director; Catherine Robbe-Grillet as Lucette

An Abstract Candidate

 

Assassins can be funny too.

Trans-Europ-Express is a meta-film, introducing three individuals - including director-writer Alain Robbe-Grillet himself and his life partner Catherine Robbe-Grillet - on the titular train line in France, imaging a film about drug smuggling which is the film we will be seeing playing out. Immediately a lark is had in imagining first a cartoonish version of this tale, with fake beards and a cartoon smoking bomb on board, but the production breaks the fourth wall constantly, alongside introducing Jean-Louis Trintignant as Elias, already in the midst of a drug smuggling plot when he briefly enters their car. Around him a story is set up, beginning with Elias getting on board with cocaine in a secret compartment in his suitcase and a book cut out to hold a pistol.

The film, more so than others from Alain Robbe-Grillet, is a flex in storytelling as a concept itself, a pulpy crime story which just happens to makes its artificiality know to the viewer throughout. Revisions to the story, trying to figure out what the tale is, happen and are usually caused by Catherine Robbe-Grillet's character making sure, as the secretary keeping audio recorded notes, that plot continuity is kept alongside the three questioning new ideas, such as considering (and rejecting) the idea to change to diamond smuggling. Plot holes are explained and they remove the cocaine on Elias' person, even completely ditching a plot thread and whole character by asking between each other why a young woman introduced onscreen would steal his suitcase in the first case for one considered twist.

It plays this narrative straight, but this game-within-a-game is compelling in itself. There is also how Elias has a fetish for bondage, seen when he hides a magazine, between a more respectable one, of female models posing tied up or wrapped in chains. This connects to Robbe-Grillet's own taste for this, but it is also part of the simulacra here too, the faking and constructing of scenarios, as he is introduced to a prominent character of Eva (Marie-France Pisier), a sex worker who he pays for a staged scenario of forced restraint and rape. That scene is going to make some viewers understandably uncomfortable, but it is all acted out as a consenting act by her and Elias, part of the games of the film as fiction as he will return to her to play out this bondage scenario.

She will play out a potential femme fatale role, as her connection to the criminal group Elias is trying to ingratiate himself within becomes more noticeable. The gang itself, playing to Alain Robbe-Grillet's films being about their stories being games or shifting in how they are staged, set out constant tests for Elias to react to, from the entire fake like of Father Petitjean the mythical drunk priest used for coding messages, to even staging fake cops apprehending him. Trans-Europ-Express is arguably one of the more accessible works for Alain Robbe-Grillet because it is a genre pastiche, which unlike Eden and After (1970) is more focused on the plot it is still undercutting. Elias' journey in the game, as it is being connected and made sense of by its creators, still becomes a crime story at heart even if the film knows it is all staged and plays to this. Even its style, the sleek cinematography by Willy Kurant, befits a pastiche of films like this from this era. Only its BDSM content really takes this to another tone, in mind to Robbe-Grillet's real life obsessions, but even this within the movie plays to the whole constructed nature. Even when this gets serious in the end, with everything closing in on Elias after he actually kills someone, the film openly undercuts this with a wink and a happy ending, reminding everyone viewing this elaborate and perfectly made film it is still a story.

 

Abstract Spectrum: Metatextual

Abstract Rating (High/Medium/Low/None): Low

Thursday, 30 March 2023

Successive Slidings of Pleasure (1974)

 


Director: Alain Robbe-Grillet

Screenplay: Alain Robbe-Grillet

Cast: Anicée Alvina as The Prisoner; Olga Georges-Picot as Nora; Michael Lonsdale as The Judge; Jean Martin as The Priest; Marianne Eggerickx as Claudia; Claude Marcault as Soeur Julia; Maxence Mailfort as Client / Customer; Nathalie Zeiger as Sister Maria; Bob Wade as Fossoyeur / Gravedigger; Jean-Louis Trintignant as The police Lieutenant

An Abstract Candidate

 

Maybe you ate some glass.

Broken egg yolks, a red liquid visibly evoking blood and broken glass intermingle amidst the opening sots of Successive Slidings of Pleasure. Said opening is a barrage o non-linear images and sounds - centred on a young female prisoner (Anicée Alvina) in jail, with machine gun fire, broken glass and drones among the sounds - whilst the cast is introduced one-by-one. It was a film sold for its erotic content, but just from this opening, the sound design alone, Alain Robbe-Grillet's film keeps one unsettled, not a conventional film the slightest.

It is, to an outsider, a confrontational and alien film, a tale of a young woman who may have killed an older woman Nora (Olga Georges-Picot), likely her lover. After Jean-Louis Trintignant has questioned her, this prisoner finds herself in incarceration in a place ran by nuns for all criminal young women like her. With its numerous scenes of white walls, even the composition of scenes in this lower budget film is disarming, in humorous details like a bicycle strategically in shot in the all-white bedroom she and Nora lived in, and Nora dies within, to Robbe-Grillet never having the colour green ever appear onscreen. Repeating motifs - red paint (and the painting of bodies like one of Yves Klein's compositions), eggs, broken glass - cause one to feel off-centre to the material. We will see Alvina's lead wrap men and women around her fingers, or more aptly with her aura, either a wide eyed innocent teen or a seductress to whoever it is that dares enter her prescience. Sometimes both and she even has a vampire symbolism around her.

The film is going to be an uncomfortable transgressive experience for some, as a very sexually explicit work with deliberate taboos, just alone from Anicée Alvina being seventeen at the time of the film. This is the only aspect which is of its era, the transgression beyond this more deliberate, as she is seen nude and in scenes of a (softcore) sexual nature; beyond this, alongside Alvina being a compelling lead, with a magnetic charisma, her character is also a character beyond just being an object to lust over. The film is about this proudly devious figure, a true anti-heroine in the sense that, between nymphet and woman, she takes controls always over the rest of the gullable cast. Robbe-Grillet's trademark that his films are openly artificial is also here, even in the English title Successive Slidings of Pleasures having an unsettling nature as much as it wants you to cheer the lead on, even if her taste of music, of screams of a woman being tortured, are a very acquired taste. The subversion of Catholicism in the film is its own taboo as well.

Our lead, who is liable to fabricate tales to bend people to her, is an extreme, one that when a female student during a field trip died, falling off a seaside cliff, she begins to star molesting the body of as a young Isabelle Huppert looks on disgustedly. With a film around her that is not conventional at all, the vampiric/witch metaphors are apt as those who try to tame her either are bedridden at death's door from her constant badgering, as what happens to Michael Lonsdale's judge, or is turned into someone like her, as what happens to her female lawyer, the recasting of Olga Georges-Picot in the same role a doppelganger motif in itself, becoming a vampiric figure in her own right lusting over another young woman in the nun ran jail. As with all Alain Robbe-Grillet films, he plays to the artificiality of his films even in deliberate alienation effects Bertolt Brecht used, even for one of his films closest to a lurid genre film from this time, Euro-horror and erotica. One such example, when not accidentally catching on film the sound of a real guillotine being erected at the location they were filming within off-screen, is the casting of Georges-Picot herself, her dual casting also contrasted by the fact that she has very early plastic surgery for breast enhancement. Far from a crass thing to point out, it means that her body has artificiality, her figure not changing laid down, which Robbe-Grillet deliberately contrasts in duplication, matching Nora anatomically against a mannequin she and the lead have, disturbing one that they ritually break to pieces and stab with scissors.

The film is absolutely perverse on purpose, even in recreating the work of Yves Klein. Klein, who developed his own type of blue paint, International Klein Blue (IKB), created the work Anthropometry of the Blue Period, in which he would have women strip and paint their bodies in this colour blue to imprint on canvases, recreated here with Anicée Alvina using red paint, alongside the motif of body painting with body painting between her character and Nora. It is a film which in terms of plot too is going to challenge as it is around a series of scenarios where a lead who does not even have a name provided to her finds herself in control, where the trial will never happen and even an ouroboros transpires for the final scene, repeating everything again in the film we never see after. It stands out, probably one of the strongest if you can accept its transgressions of these Alain Robbe-Grillet films in how much its motifs and tone burn into the mind, such as the bed frame washed up on the beach encountered repeatedly. Undeniably, it is challenging yet in itself, its style is paradoxically easier to sell, but it befits the term "cult" perfectly as much as it is too uncompromising to be placed in any genre tag.

Abstract Spectrum: Avant-Garde/Transgressive

Abstract Rating (High/Medium/Low/None): High

Wednesday, 1 March 2023

Eden and After (1970)

 


Including a review of N. Took The Dice... (1971)

Director: Alain Robbe-Grillet

Screenplay: Alain Robbe-Grillet

Cast: Catherine Jourdan as Violette; Pierre Zimmer as Duchemin; Richard Leduc as Marc-Antoine; Lorraine Rainer as Marie-Eve; Sylvain Corthay as Jean-Pierre; Juraj Kukura as Boris; Jarmila Kolenicová as Sonia; Ludovít Króner as Franc

An Abstract Candidate

 

We are already into the unconventional when the opening credits invoke a late sixties Jean-Luc Godard production, spoken aloud with arrangements of words in-between staff/cast credits like a psychosexual word association game. “Game” is apt, as acclaimed novelist and later filmmaker Alain Robbe-Grillet came to filmmaking as making openly artificial works. His film here is a game, an abstract one with the tropes of a genre thriller played by its characters as a game.

In the centre of this is Violette (Catherine Jourdan) and a group of disillusioned university students who hang out at a café called Eden, acting out scenarios as Franc (Ludovít Króner), the waiter, is their fabled sinister butler who may have been involved in white trafficking and drugs smuggling (or not) in a previous life. They play out mock games of violence, male and female members, such as an act of rape or Russian roulette with the twist of one person wearing a blind fold with the gun, and a die being rolled to choose the target with added randomness. Though I will view Robbe-Grillet's work as being artificial on purpose, I cannot help to see a post May 1968 haze seep over this. There is a cynical sense that these misanthropic students belong to a group who, after the May 1968 protests in France where across the country and in different forms the left wing challenged the right wing, were left in a permanent ennui when they were not able to change the world. With no sense of meaning or ability to change the world, these students at Eden now stage poisonings steeped in boredom. The world around them is abstract by itself, with this marking Robbe-Grillet's first colour film too, the world as precisely put together and contrasted even when, as a Tunisian co-production, he filmed in the real Tunisian landscape.

It stands out fully in mind to this, even in terms of his obsession and hatred of the colour green, jettisoned entirely on camera here next to other primary and secondary colours. Aptly the staged deaths in Eden are within a café which is an avant-garde installation in itself, with erotic photography on the walls contrasted by pop art squares of pure primary colour as the tables to seating cubes followed the same aesthetic choices. Even when the film, as mentioned, moves to Tunisia, filming in real locations as part of its conspiracy plot involving a man known as Duchemin/the Dutchman (Pierre Zimmer) and a picture in Violette’s possession, the locations are still striking especially in the buildings and their interiors, designed with pure white with blue prominently used for the likes of the doors. As a result, a vast amount of scenes in movement and still shots are eye-catching, the cast figures made by the director to position and pose in the midst of all this, as they themselves play out choreographed games even with real death involved.

Eden and After, in all honesty, is a work of pure style, knowingly an abstract collage of Alain Robbe-Grillet's obsessions turned into genre tropes as an artificial construct. Duchemin, as a mystery man, first shakes the film towards a plot, the catalyst when he enters the café and shows the learnt knowledge of esoteric abilities to the students from living in Africa, such as powders which induce one’s worse fears. His existence, and possible faked death, pushes Violette to travel to Tunisia and a conspiracy, involving her fellow students and Franc who are after a picture she inherited from her late uncle. The plot itself is a machination, mere context, a structure for the characters and Robbe-Grillet's obsessions, contrasted as much as Duchemin’s erotic masochistic-sadist art, posing his mistress and other women completely naked against white background, against harsh props such as inside steel cages or against doorways. Ultimately this is a mood piece, prominently evoking Robbe-Grillet's real life practices in BDSM among the fascination with games and the structure of games. This could provide some viewers with great discomfort, as he contrasts the full eroticization of women, lusted over in their nudity, against their apparent pain in chains, tied to wheels and being bound. Bear in mind, whether your position on these images, his own life included the importance of Catherine Robbe-Grillet, his widow who worked on this film in the cast and whose career has included being a writer of sadomasochistic writing. With a marriage to the end of his life which included sadomasochistic practices and an open relationship on both sides, she also would become a dominatrix who work continued into even her eighties onwards1; details like this, of someone important in the director-writer's life, does need to be factored in, his legitimate desires in sado-masochism in real life and his films to be contrasted by the woman who together shared a loving relationship and this obsession with. It at least complicates this even if, truthfully, these scenes are the ones in Eden and After which may prove the most discomforting even if they are entirely artificial even in how the characters are depicted.

Even in mind to this, his general fascination (and clear fantasies) of beautiful women in forms of restraint, usually naked here, is an acquired taste and one that become more prominent in his films when they found colour, the erotic becoming more a factor as he went with his film career. The artifice is still there in the actresses (as people and their bodies) posed and contrasted against pure white and manmade objects, and even the male actors are figures he places onscreen. The use of blood, obviously fake but profuse and in vast quantities in deep poster red, is more lurid and shocking in its artifice, such as a suicide in a pure white Tunisian bathtub of stone, the transgression found in something so strikingly simple as using colour itself in purely fictional and un-realistic form. The irony is not lost knowing Alain Robbe-Grillet was an author, using words first, using the visuals themselves here to great effect, which is why too Igor Luther as the cinematographer and Anton Krajcovic for art direction deserve a huge amount of praise for what the pair brought to the film with Robbe-Grillet.

The second half of Eden and After, in Tunisia, still progresses the template of a plot, but is also more of a non-linear piece with Violette experiencing the web of deceit and conspiracy in her relationship with Duchemin and those trying to find the picture. It is, even for Robbe-Grillet's films I have seen, a work which is explicitly more of a conceptual piece, an avant garde production just as liable to have turned into a later era Jean-Luc Godard film as it is undoubtedly a lurid genre piece from this era of sexploitation. The content of the film, more extreme than before, is of a type Alain Robbe-Grillet would fit more in with his later films if still out of synch with them, too avant-garde and too idiosyncratic for even that sexploitation tag to fully work for them. Certainly it is as compelling as it is incredibly idiosyncratic, the equivalent for a famous author penning a pastiche of a genre story, dissecting it entirely to contrast its tropes into striking images, legitimately in this case for the images onscreen.

This was not the end of the film as, creating its mirror sibling, an alternative cut called N. Took the Dice (1971) was produced. Deserving to be included in this review side-by-side, Robbe-Grillet created a remix of Eden and After, which included existing footage with outtakes and materials from the shot itself. The narrator, with dice, talks at the beginning directly to the viewers on TV having to be in an order, with shows that need to be explained, with a complete lack of enigma; the irony is that, whilst this deliberately obfuscates this later eventually to question this concept, Robbe-Grillet here is playing a perverse game of taking a work, originally meant to deconstruct a story, and turning into a work of telling a new story, through reused footage and that not used in the original version.

Tonally it does feel different, right in the beginning with significant greater use of footage of the locals in the Tunisia shot before.  Violette is now the nameless figure to be christened Eve, a figure N. is aware of from his past as he gives her this name and gives us this tale she is within. Duchemin is now a nefarious older man with connections to female slavery with an interest with Eve, the painting of the first film still important but the context changed. This does not feel like a pointless reinterpretation as, whilst the use of older footage is prominent, the context is radically changed, and the previously unseen footage adds a lot. There is even humour, like the fake advertisement (using scenes in the Eden cafe) of a personal anti-pick pocket/theft device for women that can fit in their pocket. Now a story of Duchemin being a trafficker in kidnapped women, Eve his newest target, and other characters trying to rescue her, Robbe-Grillet not only changes the story completely, showing how stories can be told with the same footage, but this even brings in realities within realities, where alternative realities between Tunisia and the Eden cafe can be entered between each other, becoming as abstract as the original as a result in its own distinct way. The only aspect which is unexpected to Alain Robbe-Grillet himself is that far less, if almost none, of the BDSM themes are here, and whilst sensuality is referred to, it is never explicitly depicted either even in nudity, which also changes the tone. The more expected aspect, considering its sister film, is when this ends with the joke that our lead has won a washing machine, least a post card says so. It is not really a spoiler to a production which, whilst taking a subversive route by actually telling a story, is still an Alain Robbe-Grillet film which is going to undercut this game itself. N. Took the Dice does work as its own film, but honestly, it needs to co-exist with Eden and After; together they make a compelling pair, Eden and After the superior film but N. Took the Dice as rewarding when the two can reinterpret the other.

Abstract Spectrum: Atmospheric/Avant-Garde

Abstract Rating (High/Medium/Low/None): High

======

1) The Thin End of the Whip, written by Toni Bentley, published for Vanity Fair on February 2014.

Thursday, 13 August 2015

Last Year At Marienbad (1960)

From http://41.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lmedsf
7SQ81qaz1ado1_500.jpg
Director: Alain Resnais
Screenplay: Alain Robbe-Grillet
Actors: Delphine Seyrig; Giorgio Albertazzi; Sacha Pitoëff
94 minutes

Synopsis: In a hotel, a man named X (Giorgio Albertazzi) tells a woman called A (Delphine Seyrig) that they met the year before and have been in an adulterous relationship away from her husband M (Sacha Pitoëff). A denies this as their reality continually distorts and the figures in the hotel's halls occasionally freeze in time.

From https://ktismatics.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/marienbad-pistols.png
Last Year At Marienbad, despite being firmly part of the European art cinema that would be dominant in the sixties, is still very unique besides them. It shows the elliptical nature of many of these films, the experimentation, the existentialism, and for those who despised these films, an absence of surface level "entertainment", but the result is bold in its execution even compared to the more bolder experiments of the era like Jean-Luc Godard's films. Films like ...Marienbad are "entertaining" to me for their experimentation, and melodrama is still there in these films only in bitterer and more post-modern forms. ...Marienbad is one of the few openly puzzle-like entries of the French New Wave, others I've seen even if they were unconventional in structure still retaining a clear narrative guideline or a clear theme. ...Marienbad is inherently disorientation, the meeting of a bold experimental film maker in Resnais meeting a bold author of experimental literature in Robbe-Grillet.

Large portions are a horror film in the robbing of its characters of control. X at times shows the ability to manipulate the film to his desires as the narrator, altering the world in his own image, but when his memory slips or brutality steps in he is powerless. A film of an unbroken, fluctuating dream, it traps its characters in an illusion. The difficulty one can find with such presentation can be lightened when you picture the scenes in the context, to paraphrase Kurt Vonnegut, of the characters being unstuck in time. The only clear, tangible thing is the hotel the drama takes place in, set around the 1920s or so, and that there has likely been an act of adultery or unfaithfulness even if nothing has been committed physically or X is merely trying to instigate a fictional one. It's not out-of-place to reference Stanley Kubrick's The Shining (1980) - if Kubrick's story is about a family being haunted by the ghosts in the hotel they are staying in, ...Marienbad be it about ghosts who are already dead or living statues being haunted by their never-ceasing cycles. A stasis is felt with amnesia effecting X eventually as much as for A. A horror film is apt as a description as, while it is depicted in beautiful monochrome by cinematography Sacha Vierny, the bearings of what ever happened if anything, or even if there was a last year, is less and less clear as the film goes along. As the film distorts its timeframe, various events are evoked subtly in the editing and shifts between locations and periods that show the worse scenarios that could happen, including sexual violence, that horrifies X and A equally.

From https://ktismatics.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/marienbad-mirror.png
It's redundant and irritating to merely view ...Marienbad as an "arty film", art for art's sake without emotional connection. The drama is varying depending on the viewer but there. Clues of the situation are there. The game played continually that X keeps losing to M suggests an inevitability of fate that will undermine X the same way as will happen to Max Von Sydow playing chess with the Grim Reaper. The duplication of a specific object pulls the film into science fiction and also shows the endlessness of this reality onscreen that X tries to break, though he is as much into question as scenes show him as being as monstrous to his own horror as he is in love with A sincerely. ...Marienbad is different to other films that share these themes and concepts because it doesn't placate to simple little treats for the viewer to indulge in which even terrible movies can replicate, entertaining or not. There is no cheap sentiment, no dumb laughs or anything easy for even a dreadful film to be able to achieve well. With ...Marienbad one has to work, but most of the work is accepting that it has no clear narrative end, left a mystery, and that its use of editing and tone will have to settled with at first.

From https://ishootthepictures.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/
vlcsnap-2010-07-05-15h22m13s199.png
Technical Detail:
Vital to the success of ...Marienbad is the location, shot with two German castles and French studio sets to make up the one looming environment, with its perfect symmetrical garden and elaborate decor, that becomes as much part of the puzzle of the narrative chunks. It is a literal labyrinth with no sense of true geography, a flux of rooms and corridors that could easily switch places. Corridors blur with other corridors and the scale overwhelms the individuals perpetually in evening suits and gowns. The cinematography by Vierny ground these despondent locations into one single, workable whole. It is exceptional, both in the visuals and the use of long camera pans, the camera as much a visitor inside the hotel lost between the characters. The locations themselves in their decoration, from the statues to floral carvings, bring a viewer to a level of aesthetic joy but there is a stilted decay, obsoleteness, to it all in the extravagance that is choking. As with the figures within these sets, awkward and straight-jacketed in their arch mannerisms and performances, this decor becomes a suffocating environment felt by the viewer too as it follows the camera.

The editing is also absolutely vital for the film's puzzle structure to allow ...Marienbad to work as the elusive film it is. Flashbacks intermingle with flash forwards, and time takes place in various forms at the same time as the character suddenly appear in one place to another in the same spots. Editing alongside the camera is one of the most important tools of cinema, its use and absence, if my amateur education in cinema has taught me anything. Films like this show why, with editors Jasmine Chasney and Henri Colpi perfect in constructive what was needed for Resnais and Robbe-Grillet's cinematic game. Interestingly Robbe-Grillet put many directorial and camera instructions in the script, which would be seen as taboo in any other circumstance like in modern mainstream cinema, but Resnais followed the instructions faithfully only adding his own touches including in areas not considered in the screenplay. The result is the marriage of two strong auteurist voices supported by talented individuals working on their puzzle. Out of both figures, Robbe-Grillet's films when he decided to become a director soon after would run with the same manipulations of time and identity biting at the extremes of this one.

The music, which intermingles classical and modernist compositions, stimulates further intensity to the material. Especially with the organ heard numerous times throughout this is the score of a horror film, its jarring nature against the compositions implicating audibly the trap the participants are in.

From http://images1.laweekly.com/imager/last-year-at-marienbad
/u/original/5420061/marienbad.jpg
Abstract Spectrum: Abstract / Expressionist
Abstract Rating (High/Medium/Low/None): High

The ending resounds with an attempt to escape the hotel and the film's structure itself. The issue is, however, whether this escape is at all possible or if the overlaying repetition will start from the beginning again with X and A in their original places, like pieces in an elaborate board game or a toy construction. The results of each previous event has led to tragedy only to start again. It is only because the film itself ends that we don't see if anyone has escaped permanently.

But the film can be interpreted another way, and far from a cop-out, this deliberate lack of a clear meaning is powerful, because the idea is the hotel itself stuck in a time bubble, the outcome depending on the viewer as if they were in it as participants themselves. The conflict in the film is shown poignantly when X and A discuss, as X narrates, a pair of statues in the garden, the male protecting the woman or the woman pointing out a distant object or both. Like these statues its actively encouraged by the editing and chronological distortions to see scenes in multiple ways. My opinion of what ends the plot could be different from yours, and that is not problematic because the film is designed, like for the characters, for all viewers engaged with the film to appear back out of it through different "corridors" and exits. The result has never been replicated from any film I've seen yet and it'd take a one-off like ...Marienbad to be its mirror. The Shining comes off as its more genre based blood sibling with different intentions. Robbe-Grillet's own films from the few I've seen don't reach this level of abstraction but work their own grooves. David Lynch's INLAND EMPIRE (2006) is the closest thing and is a film few will be patient with as with ...Marienbad.

From http://screencrave.com/wp-content/uploads/2013
/06/Last-Year-at-Marienbad-Jaime-2-June-2013.jpg
Personal Opinion:
Is there entertainment is the film considering how its described? Yes, as a depiction of an endless fluctuating maze. Horror films dabble with mazes and endless cycles, but ...Marienbad has the most dreamlike and effecting. So do fantasy and science fiction movies connect to the film. If a genre is to be attempted haphazardly to be placed on the film, it's at least existential and opulent. A story of beings trapped in a labyrinth of time, a film of a film itself in conflict with itself. Far from navel gazing this is willing to have the film pull itself to pieces and while there is a way to interpret the theme as about cinema, it also works in the context of a person existing in deathless ennui, drifting through corridors not sure where they were the year before. Its only not entertainment if one comes into Last Year At Marienbad expecting a romantic comedy or Steven Seagal to appear amongst the living statues, but the DVD cover at least on my copy should warn you neither of the following appear anyway.

Befittingly, this puzzle has a cameo from the Master on the right.
(From http://scrapheap.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Marienbad-1.jpeg)

Thursday, 10 July 2014

The Immortal One (1963)

From http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Nz39U4iRLqs
/U6RbZD-dN-I/AAAAAAAACXM/NiMJN4YB28k/s1600/limmortelle-poster.jpg

Dir. Alain Robbe-Grillet

It's always an exciting movement, intentional choice of words, when a film director is resurrected or given their first introduction in this age of DVD and Blu-ray. The potential of a new landscape connected to cinema's vast Chinese puzzle box form. Even if the director has had DVD releases before, a grand scale celebration and restoration could have volcanic impact on film viewers - we await Walerian Borowczyk's day in the sun, not that far from when I'm writing this, in Britain. You come to a film like The Immortal One, the debut cinematic work of an acclaimed author and writer of Last Year In Marienbad (1961), and the already rich symbolism, such as our lost protagonist N (Jacques Doniol-Valcroze) finding discarded calendar pages in the woods, no transition between picking them up, just cut to different dates in his hands, and an entirely new room in what cinema means is kicked open for me.

From http://filmint.nu/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Two.jpg
N, a foreigner to Istanbul, encountering the beautiful woman L (Françoise Brion), sparking an intimate relationship. When she seemingly vanishes however, everything is up to question, he knowing little about her. Her name she gives him may be fake, she may be married, may be part of a white slavery practice, a total mystery woman elusive to him. The recent release of six of Robbe-Grillet's films for the first time in Britain, including The Immortal One, allows not only for the films to be viewable, but also as a box set for the UK releases, for the themes and ideas to intertwine, an introduction to the director. A person who the greater concern is for the enigmatic nature of his films, the truths held by his characters vaguer and questionable as they go further along. His characters travel in worlds that multiply and distort themselves as they go. When it doesn't, as in the case of Successive Slidings of Pleasure (1974), the last film in the set, it's because the protagonist is the one undermining the truth to every other character with their words. N in Robbe-Grillet's first film is left wandering the city of Istanbul, viewed by the mystery woman as a fake city of his dreams, eventually the fabric of reality against dreams being pierced. To those who have never seen one of Robbe-Grillet's films, this one is comparable to David Lynch. In a paradox worthy of his ideals, the director's work can be compared to various other films - Jean-Luc Godard with Trans-Europ-Express (1966), Czeck cinema (shot in Czechoslovakia) with The Man Who Lies (1968), pop art and the French New Wave with Eden and After (1970), and Jess Franco and softcore with Successive Slidings of Pleasure. Yet he is uniquely his own voice in that what undercuts the realities - lies, conspiracies, himself and a producer and a continuity girl scrapping plot points in favour of others film-within-a-film for Trans-Europ-Express - between intellectual deconstruction and a obsession with the fetishishtic that connects to his well know proclivities for bondage and S&M.

From http://i59.fastpic.ru/big/2014/0330/06/f132002ac8b2954cc8ee477944ef0b06.png
In his debut its clearly established where he would go and that, having gone backwards in viewing the released box set chronologically, this film and Successive Slidings Of Pleasure inherit the same mind behind them even if their tones are different. Bold use of cinematography from a man known for his letters and words in novels, rich black-and-white cinematography depicting the Turkish environments. Time is disrupted continually, scenes in the past, future or never having happened spliced between a moment taking place. The disorientating ability of dreams to be able to look at all these sides, inwards and outwards, of a reality, interlocking scenes taking place. A funeral procession is on a white stone courtyard, at the bottom of the screen going upwards, and not an edit later, creating an almost empty space baring one vague figure at the top. Human statues, like Last Year of  Marienbad, of people, stuck in time, strangely reminiscent of the graveyard, frequented onscreen, of the pillar shaped gravestones, a place long gone from practical use, as the supernatural nature of the film's title is emphasised from a car accident that takes place onward.

From http://theleastpictureshow.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/alain-robbe-grillet-16.jpg
A conspiracy is seemingly taking place around N as he becomes more and more at a loss as he moves along. A fisherman outside his hotel is continually nearby, maybe the mystery woman's husband. Maybe it's the blind man with two Doberman pinchers who develop into nocturnal creatures of fate. Are they involved in a conspiracy in another way or is it mere illusion? More so as the film keeps cutting back to a woman lying on a beach, waking up and saying to someone stood over her she has been dreaming. Like Last Year At Marienbad, the sense of reality is suspect, the chique aesthetics of exotic Turkey, of glamorous women in states of undress and suave men in suits, is undercut as more people look at N suspiciously and the facts are for question. The desire for the mystery woman leads to him even having a scene of self reflection as time seemingly stands still, as he can reflect on his own reflection in front of an antique store window in that moment. By the end, the film repeats itself, sending him into a fate beyond him.

From http://i59.fastpic.ru/big/2014/0330/43/9b9e3ff23227765122b9bbdc40840143.png
Aesthetically bold - ancient Byzantium ruins against modern ruins of a ship in the harbour, carpets hanging everywhere and bustle of city streets rife - it doesn't feel like Robbe-Grillet made any amateur mistakes here with his debut, but already knew where to go. The use of environments, as Robbe-Grillet would continue five movies on, adds to the layers that multiply as you watch along. Underground tunnels, mosques but also ordinary places fleshed out into new dimensions, such as the metaphor for the isolation of a hotel room being ran with as N is complete alien within it to the rest of the world, something returned to for The Man Who Lies. It would continue further from this with the other films - Trans-Europ-Express with the titular train and cityscapes, The Man Who Lies with its rooms and woodland, Eden And After with its mazes of industrial land, Tunisian village squares and a cafe crossed with a pop art installation, and Successive Slidings of Pleasure with its extremely restriction aesthetic and its fetishisation of bare walls and cramped underpass stairs, literal with the former with body paint printed onto it. Again this can be compared to other directors, but this is from the perspective of a cerebral writer who likes mysteries, and realises the power of  using the environments for this with the assistances of the cinematographers, camera operators and set designers who worked with him.

From http://i2.imageban.ru/out/2014/03/27/c3de446df0d9660b9427c7a8711fe791.png
And it's a mystery that entices. His more abstract work onwards from this has a playful, even lurid, quality to them that can help a viewer not used to going through meta and self commentating deconstructions. This is why, interestingly, Robbe-Grillet can be placed with the aforementioned Jess Franco, and got y DVD/Blu-Ray combo releases in the United States from the same company that did the same for Franco's work. Robbe-Grillet, the man of letters who is clearly obsessed with pulp as you get to films like Trans-Europ-Express, would've been pleased to  be housed with both such a genre luminary unfairly dismissed and also be released by the British Film Institute alongside Akira Kurosawa and Carl Theodor Dreyer in a different country. The protagonist is sent through a mystery as seen in many films, the same question asked - who is this woman? - but Robbe-Grillet is much more precise in the telling of the question than others. The film, no matter how further it reaches the abstract, is always going to an event or moment that has a reason to be included, just to displace the viewer to a momentous shift in tone. Utterances about people, individuals going silent and cautious, brief glimpses if someone out in the corner of the eye, all is precise even if the first viewing for me is a dream that baffled trying to absorb it all in. And it turns into a displacement of the scenario as it wraps up. The protagonist N who, bearing in mind Robbe-Grillet's continual obsession with archetypes, is vague himself, a little weak and displaced as a figure. His mystery woman, made of smoke, a belly dancer to only his (and our gaze) at one point, first scene in snap shots divided by blinds of his hotel window, as  if he's made her up, has more complexity than him. The scenario that Istanbul is a place of seedy conspiracy, common in pulp about foreign countries, the exotic as the other, is also undercut by how much it's mentioned N's view of the city is a mere illusion. The locals could be staring at him because he's weird to them, continually asking odd questions about a woman to the shopkeepers and maids he had never even learnt to name of. From there - his own delusions, real conspiracy, or a siren beckoning him to doom - a tiny Möbius strip takes places in the film, time repeating but with significant changes. A Doberman, black fur, peering out in the illuminated darkness of a car lights on a road. It's what one would wish debut to be, more so when learning how difficult it was to get this film made, Robbe-Grillet able to work much, much (for emphasis) quicker as he went on. The obvious questions to ask now is how his novels as an acclaimed writer in French literature, out there for me to find and read, set this film up and was a continuation of it, and how he went on after the last disc of my acquired box set as the filmmaker, almost all of which needing its own box set some day. It is a cinema that can link to others I can recognise already, but is clearly its own, unique one. Vibrant while being very intellectual, possibly in dangers of pretensions in the later works, which become more sexually explicit and divisive in their deconstructive games, but with so much to provide still. Apparently The Immortal One is a weak Robbe-Grillet film, at least according to the booklet in the DVD set; directors would kill for this as a debut considering how colourless, forgive the pun on the film's monochrome look, or compromised some can be.

From https://celluloidwickerman.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/imm_banner02.jpg

Abstract Rating (High/Medium/Low/None) - Medium
It would be Low if Robbe-Grillet never made another film or went on to be more conventional. It's a mystery with leanings towards rearranging your protagonist's perceptions encountered in many films of the sixties. It's a Medium having fed myself on five other films by him, and how noticeably more unconventional it is having seen what came after. He was one step away from Jorge Luis Borges' The Garden of Forking Paths, a character dying in one chapter, alive in the next, as what happens in The Man Who Lies. For all I know, that does happen in The Immortal One too.

Personal Opinion
It's a great moment when films, or any work, are finally allowed to be seen by the general public, not as a retrospective, but on a purchasable material, even data file. True, this is likely a niche only people like me knew of being made available, but it's now possible to have six films, one a reinterpretation of Eden and After called N. Took The Dice (1971), a fitting connection, in circulation. It's adding a new colour to the spectrum when it's films by an idiosyncratic voice, no matter how divisive they are. New games to use what Robbe-Grillet was playing watching these films. An entire new wing of my cinema, with five films that can be added to the blog later down the line, and others just out of reach.