![]() |
From http://movieworld.ws/wp-content/uploads /2013/12/Cigarette-Burns-2005.jpg |
Director: John Carpenter
Screenplay: Drew McWeeny and Scott
Swan
Cast: Norman Reedus (as Kirby); Colin
Foo (as Fung); Udo Kier (as Bellinger); Christopher Redman (as Willowy Being); Chris
Gauthier (as Timpson); Zara Taylor (as Annie)
A Night of a Thousand Horror (Shows) #5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27a6/f27a6e1a69df743fb5514e6f891d3642703954b5" alt=""
It itself was likely chosen as
the first episode to release as it caught horror fans' interest immediately. The
last major production before Cigarette
Burns was Ghosts of Mars (2001),
a divisive sci-fi horror film which would be his last theatrical film until
2011. Back then, I was watching this episode with a passing interest in Carpenter, growing up with The Thing (1982) and Halloween (1978). Now revisiting the
episode, its having grown to admire Carpenter
as a working director so good technically at his work he deserved auteur status
regardless.
Cigarette Burns is sadly terrible. It follows the notion of a
cursed film, Norman Reedus as a
cinema owner and private collector of rare prints for wealthy customers
searching for a legendary work called La
Fin Absolue du Monde for Udo Kier,
a film when screened in the seventies in a cinema caused deaths and violence in
the audience. With a heap of personal tragedy in his own life, Reedus himself enters a vortex of
strange phenomenon just on the hunt for the film before actually finding a
print. It's an instantly fascinating idea, meta and potentially pretension with
its continuous film references but a premise following Ringu (1998), has a great urban legend within itself of objects
having a greater power than mere material of recording, cinema as a medium that
can tap into a person's subconscious beyond simplistic surface emotions. Like Ringu, it also suggests the inherently
haunted notion that film can resurrect the dead by their repeating images being
permanently attached to film as long as it survives, which within a story where
the protagonist is haunted by the death of his girlfriend, with her father with
a gun at his side hanging outside Reedus'
cinema, would be pertinent.
What happens however is that
rather than leaving La Fin Absolue du
Monde as a mere McGuffin whilst the hero investigates its existence, so
many scenes even into the finale constantly repeat of how La Fin Absolue du Monde is an evil creation rather than demonstrate
way and let the images or implications mortify the viewer. It's called evil.
The people who saw it in the cinema call it evil in their scenes. One as a
viewer has no ideas why it's exactly evil but characters keep banging on that
its evil. So much so that not only will the images briefly seen won't live up
to its build-up, closer to one of those intros Redemption Video would put in front of one of their Jean Rollin DVD releases barring the
softcore nudity, but it's a crass implication of a far more powerful premise
which wastes dialogue on repeating the exact same dialogue that La Fin Absolue du Monde is evil without
depth.
Instead of the film being a
haunted entity, the celluloid equivalent of Nigel
Kneale's stone tape, it becomes part of an undeveloped pseudo Christian myth
about angels and people driven to making snuff films, all of which that
trivialises the inherent provocation of cinema as a construct, something which
is more than an item to shot footage on but can be manipulated in material
(physical or digital) to cause effects on the viewer. The subplot about Reedus' girlfriend cannot sustain itself
either, evoking a lesser version of Event
Horizon (1997) instead of slow burn psychological horror. In presentation, Carpenter like the other directors
follows the strict production schedule of the series, although it's nice to see
another Carpenter named Cody
score his father's work, but honestly the real issue is the entire tone of Cigarette Burns from the beginning,
reducing its premise to a faux evil which leads to a gory ending without any
sense of actual dread to it. It's a disappointing way to begin Masters of Horror, surprising for me
considering the praise the episode originally got as one of the strongest parts
when The Ward (2011) was far more
interesting than this.
![]() |
From http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-TEvJn9WYjco/UF6YrtdYEQI/ AAAAAAAAAMU/GQkuVCix1Q8/s1600/MOH+CB+1.jpg |
No comments:
Post a Comment