![]() |
From https://lh3.ggpht.com/-D2UVkUeCsSo/UijnUNCc-7I/ AAAAAAAAAa8/riC8WghsB0w/s1600/canyousurvive.jpg |
Director: Tobe Hooper
Screenplay: Tobe Hooper and Kim
Henkel
Cast: Marilyn Burns (as Sally); Allen
Danziger (as Jerry); Paul A. Partain (as Franklin); William Vail (as Kirk);
Teri McMinn (as Pam); Edwin Neal (as the Hitchhiker); Jim Siedow (as the Cook);
Gunnar Hansen (as Leatherface); John Dugan (as the Grandfather)
A Night of a Thousand Horror (Movies) #83
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fb2e/5fb2e9ac0ba6fc58a75397d091eff84fbbc776a3" alt=""
Were it not for Marilyn Burn's
white bell bottoms and some of the floral shirts, this film would exist in a
timeless reality of desolate dirt roads and petrol stations barely open. It's
routed in the political and social issues of the time it was made, but like
most of these Southern set, southern made American exploitation films (at least
the most evocative), they're one step away from the Southern Gothic, are
submerged within it. For all the realism and harshness of the film's editing
and atonal score by Tobe Hooper and Wayne Bell, it's also filled with
melancholic, almost half asleep country music and the Leatherface family can't
help but evoke something Flannery
O'Conner could create if she was more extreme, barely functioning but with
strangely idyllic family values. Working class, hard working Americans, with respect
for their grandparents and their wisdom, as the mummified Grandpa sits centre
at the dining table, Leatherface the improvised matriarch and younger brother
who keeps the home clean of random unwanted guests, a living room of bone
furniture without a brain rotting TV and a pet chicken swinging in a cage,
details which thankfully would keep being added and played with in the first
few sequels so that, whether you liked the films or not, the Leatherface family
would still be used to skewer idyllic family structures continually.
And the film's revolting in tone,
a revulsion that for certain people, who are wired a certain way like myself
and honour these horror movies, which is repulsive and strain our eyes and yet,
from a distance, attract us with their rundown, decayed allured. The Franklin
house the protagonists get to itself is full of giant balls of Daddy Long Legs
and rotten animal print wallpaper, a grim sense of abandonment before you get
to the Leatherface home full of art director Robert A. Burns' ritualistic and magnificent abominations of bone
and flesh. Notoriously the set the film worked in was hellish - rotting props,
actors like Gunner Hansen stuck with
only one costume, makeup artist Dorothy
J. Pearl accidentally stabbing herself with a needle of formaldehyde whilst
preparing real dead animals for background objects - all of which you can feel
and even smell from the screen. That it's aesthetics that of an abattoir, imagining
Frederick Wiseman's documentary Meat (1976) in its visceral and
down-to-earth nature as the film's tone without ever going into an actual
slaughterhouse, just adds to the repulsion even if I'm someone comfortable
still with eating meat.
A lot of also why the film still
retains is power is also why Tobe Hooper is
still an underappreciated director. It's impossible for me to view Chain Saw as a comedy as others can for
how unrelenting it is, too intense and like having nails pulled off, but the
tone of unpredictability and manic energy, between being twisted and then
hilariously weird, is still there and the key thing that keeps it all together,
weaving all the other virtues (the naturalist, scorched cinematography, Burns' and everyone elses' performance
etc) around it. Sadly Hooper got
dismissed for having made little of interest until his later films - The Texas Chainsaw Massacre II (1986), Lifeforce (1985), The Funhouse (1981) - got reappraisals, and even now it doesn't get
talked about enough how all his films at least to the nineties have an
incredible, frantic nature to them rare to his contemporaries, the equivalent
of someone in a straight-jacket bouncing off the rubber walls in how chaotic
the tone of the films feel, a rare virtue when even the most offensive, violent
horror film like now feels "safe" because of its measured, flat
atmosphere.
Thankfully with the 1986 sequel
this same tone, injected with more brazen humour, was resurrected creating a
personal favourite of mine alongside the original prequel, although the obvious
concern with this franchise after the first film, like with Halloween (1978) onwards, is whether
any of the same intentions are to be found in later sequels having confirmed
the first Chain Saw is a stone cold,
canonical masterpiece of the horror genre.
![]() |
From http://horrorfilmcentral.com/wp-content/uploads /2015/01/The_Texas_Chainsaw_Massacre_031.jpg |
No comments:
Post a Comment