From http://www.scifi-movies.com/images /contenu/data/0003151/affiche.jpg |
Dir. Jean Rollin
A young woman Elisabeth (Brigitte Lahaie) is being persued in the
woods, only to be discovered by Robert (Vincent
Gardnere), while he is driving, rescuing her. However she cannot remember
who she is, who she was escaping with, who she was escaping from, and any short
term memory after a few minutes. The pursuers eventually locate her and take
her back to a black tower block in the city, ran by a doctor to cover up an
incident where many people have developed the same affliction, losing all
memories and even basic motor skills, all put together in the tower out of
public view. Elisabeth intends to escape again, while eventually Robert appears
at the black tower to try and help her leave, the doctor and the armed guards
around the tower in the way. With the possible exception of Killing Car (1993), drastically
different to his filmography though still linked in mood and style to his
traditional horror films, The Night of
the Hunted has some drastic changes from many of the others. Gone are the
gothic castles, the vampires, the trademark beach scenes and the such, and in
its place, the pre to early 20th century aesthetic inspirations of Jean Rollin are replaced by
contemporary, harsh and cold urbanism of an early David Cronenberg. The result is unexpected; as I am finding Rollin is far more different then his
cult reputation originally suggested, this film emphasising the fact.
From http://www.gotterdammerung.org/film/jean-rollin/ night-of-the-hunted/night-of-the-hunted-04.jpg |
At his most restricted
financially, making a lot of porn under a pseudonym, Rollin suddenly turned to a producer, made a gamble and asked if he
could make a horror film instead. He was successful, a horror film with sci-fi
tinges and the budget of one of the porn movies he would make, with many actors
Rollin worked with in them allowed to
try something new and fresh. The surprise for me watching the film is, without
knowing this back-story originally, I never saw any structural or budget
restrictions that badly affected the film. Now knowing of the back-story, it
never feels like it's of a lesser quality still. The only real divisive aspect
of this film, in hindsight, was the abrupt inclusions of sex and violence to
appease the producer. This includes a ridiculously long sex scene between Elisabeth
and Robert, and countless nude and undressing scenes with the other actresses,
not sensual like other Rollin films
but more stark and blatant. The violence, including sexual violence, as the
mental disintegration causes violent behaviour in the victims, is even more
abrupt, nasty and for many it will feel out-of-place and off-putting, more so
as violence is never this strong in other
Jean Rollin films I've watched. As much as it is also of my own personal
taste, these aspects aren't compromises for the film's quality. In fact, in
vast contrast to Rollin's preferred
elegance, it works to add an anxiety over The
Night of the Hunted that makes it more darker and malicious in tone. It
feels outside of Rollin's usual
filmmaking, even compared to Killing Car,
envisioned almost as a Videodrome (1983)
type of movie, the sex and violence in that film's zone of emotional
detachment. Hell, even the bizarre circumstances around a character using
scissors on herself has an appropriate oddness to it.
With Jean Rollin as well, having to compromise or improvise is as much
part of his auteurist style, (like many of my favourite directors), so you
cannot ignore the accidents that happened to be able to make this film in the
first place, the scratches on its celluloid as of much importance as his fascinations.
It's a bleaker film as a result, the urban and industrial settings dehumanised.
There is a strong aesthetic as always
for Rollin, the brutal scarlet reds
on the interior walls of the black tower, the modern design etc., more imposing
and claustrophobic than other films. It's a good lesson to learn from for
potential filmmakers that, far from a detriment, having the budget severely
restricted like Rollin did here
wasn't that big of a hindrance, the kind of locations you might've found in a
porn film of the time, maybe even one of Rollin's
own, having a fittingly dead quality to them. Why this lesson has been lost in
the recent decades I'm not sure, causing one to wonder what has led to the drab
look of many a modern genre film - digital cameras, locations not easy to find,
budgets even more restricted or pure laziness? Here in this film, even the gym
has a stilted air to it, along with the other locations. Long corridors like a
maze, and cold, perfunctory furnished rooms for the unwilling occupants, who
ling or slump themselves on mass around said corridors aimlessly.
From https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/ ur7ZCLcgpWA/TXhKiaX6AKI/AAAAAAAAAO4/As6KdNgI2IU/s1600/Hunted.3.jpg |
The concept of a disease that
causes mental disintegration takes one into a existential version of Rollin's cinema, as much importance on
what happens to the occupants as their memories are lost as it is on Elizabeth
trying to escape the tower again. That it feels to throw away the potential for
this concept, in favour of the trademark mood piece tone of a Rollin film, is not an issue but
probably perfect for this particular film. Enough is said in what is shown to
savour. The occupants are a form of living dead, inventing new names for
daughters another may have had or making up new memories together. There's no
clear theme or message behind the film, but as a scenario of what such a
concept would be like, the obsession in Rollin's
films with their dream logics by way of pulp entertainment, allows for a
poignant take on the idea. Time is passed, because Jean Rollin is not a conventional director, watching someone with
an old photo book one minute, reflecting on whether it's their family or not,
the other on characters musing on whether they knew each other once and
pretending they were classroom friends as young girls regardless; what's true
or not is left for you to imagine by Rollin.
It does have moments as a result which are far more potent than if treated in a
more conventional way, such as the uncomfortable moment a character's motor
skills are so disintegrated they cannot hold a spoon properly and feed
themselves. Rather than have to follow a message, the playing around with such
a scenario evokes far more interesting ideas in-between the compromises.
From http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wECN2uot8u8/S7y19U1TYqI /AAAAAAAAHpY/ZNCuCID680I/s400/nuit01.jpg |
This is a genre film first and
foremost, Rollin a genre film
director more so than everything else, one who happened to make genre films in
his own idiosyncratic way. Despite his difficulties getting films funded, he
was still able to in an era where exploitation cinema could be made in personal
ways as long as there was something sensation and titillation for the pundits
and international markets. With this film I get further proof "pulp"
is a key inspiration and interest for the director as horror is, the reason
I've used the word twice in this review - pre or early 20th century adventure
stories, crime and mystery stories, tales of masked criminals and secret
organisations, and anything you can also think of that can be linked to this
area. Even in the closest thing science fiction, Rollin still has influences from the past in here. Even in his
nastiest toned film I've got Georges Franju
stuck in my head think of Rollin. Once guns are involved in The Night of the Hunted, when Elisabeth
tries to escape the black tower and Robert gets involved, there is as much a
tone of crime or thriller movie inherent here, furthered by the urban
locations. It furthers how more unconventional Rollin is as a director than what I initially learnt of him as,
able to mix and celebrate each genre he's interested in by making those that
exist in the middle and part of all of them.
From http://t1.someimage.com/OAeMH9P.jpg |
Abstract Rating
(High/Medium/Low/None): Low
Out of Rollin's films I've covered so far, it's not one
of the most abstract he's made, very concise narratively. Despite the moments
that feel disjointed - the gore scenes and the random moments an actresses
takes her clothes off - the film follows a full narrative, which elaborates on
the main premise up to a sobering finale, including scenes of what is done to
the amnesiacs that cannot help but evoke reality in a way that may have been
more than intended. By its final scenes it builds pulp characters in a
situation, and while they are archetypes, they have enough time onscreen to
intrigue us, leading to a sad, powerful final image, where the characters have
as much importance as the content around them. It's a narrative driven Jean Rollin, unlike the kind of
narrative driven cinema he made The Nude
Vampire (1970) where the plot strands added as the story goes on push it
into more inherently unconventional tangents, changing what has been set up
before drastically.
From http://www.midnightonly.com/wp-content/ uploads/2013/05/Night-of-the-Hunted-5.jpg |
That's not to say The Night of the Hunted is
"normal". With its clinical, uneasy tone for its content,
"medical" based sci-fi horror with a thriller tone to its palette,
the film is so far from mainstream for a genre film, lengthy moments of
characters musing on the back-story and their situations with relish for the
dialogue as exposition. There's moments as well, due to the requirements Rollin had to fulfil to make this film,
and his own interests, that are different in from conventional cinema. The
scene that stands out as one of the best, and perfect as an example of this, is
when the doctor's female assistant, to delay Robert reaching Elizabeth, asks
him to dance with her to imagined music in an outside are area before she will
tell him where she is. Someone I know online evoked Jacques Rivette in his thoughts of this scene; whether the case it
was an unpredictable moment, briefer then I remember it as yet inspired, the
same magic realistic of Rivette who
is another director with equal interest playing with genre in unexpected ways,
seen suddenly with Rollin's film here and something I relish. It's immensely
abstract in that conventions, moments like this constant throughout the film, played
with in interesting ways, so even as one of the more straight-forward of the
director's movies, it's still different from many other films in its genres of
interest.
From http://2.bp.blogspot.com/ OGRQpxA7plQ/UXXrWr1byKI/AAAAAAAADww/EgF8q4lIZ0Q/s640/NightoftheHunted19.jpg |
Personal Opinion:
The best Jean Rollin film? We shall see, but it's interesting as being
drastically different from many of the others, an underrated work possible in
the filmography. It stands out uniquely in a unique director's career and,
flawed or not, it's damn well impressive.
Enjoyed the write-up. My favorite Rollin is probably GRAPES OF DEATH, but this is a close second. (Btw, added a link to your site on my blog roll; cheers on more reviews!)
ReplyDelete