Director: Dario Argento
Screenplay: Dario Argento
Cast: Irene Miracle as Rose
Elliott; Leigh McCloskey as Mark Elliott; Eleonora Giorgi as Sara; Daria
Nicolodi as Elise Stallone Van Adler; Sacha Pitoëff as Kazanian
A Night of a Thousand Horror (Movies) / An Abstract Re-Review
Continuing on from Suspiria (1977), Inferno builds up the mythology of the Three Mothers, three
powerful witches who control the world: Mater Lachrymarum (The Lady of Tears),
Mater Suspiriorum (The Lady of Sighs) and Mater Tenebrarum (The Lady of
Darkness). Mater Suspiriorum, who occupied Germany, was central to Suspiria, whilst Mater Lachrymarum, who
appears briefly in this film, occupies Rome and is central to the 2007 Argento film Mother of Tears. Mater Tenebrarum, who rules New York, is central
to Inferno, which follows a very
simple plot mechanic that a diary from an architect and occultist about the
mothers is being suppressed violently through bloody murders to acquire all the
published copies of it. One such case in this film leads to music student Mark
Elliot (McCloskey) travelling to the
USA after learning of the distress of his sister Rose Elliot (Miracle) upon discovering the knowledge
of the Three Mothers herself, and finds himself on route to meeting Mater
Tenebrarum herself.
Inferno overcomes probably one of the biggest issues with a genre
film in structure. A narratively driven film can fall foul of being merely
dragged along by the plot exposition and having to cover the narrative beats
far too much, and as much as I have come to love many for this flaw, their
desire to explain everything rather than let you drift through the film by your
own intuition is a scourge for a lot of horror films if you want to appreciate
them not for a humoured charm. Inferno's
solution could be bluntly described as dream logic, but it is different from
this. A very simple, concise plot unfolds but both enough is explained to the
viewer whilst plenty is not, letting in moments which do not make sense in
logic but do in the nightmarish form transpire, and leaving one to travel
through the events with enough knowledge to grasp it but a lot more being
discovered alongside the characters. Splitting the film up into situations
following different characters has a pronounced effect. Everything connects
together but the segments unfold as their own narratives, usually leading to
gruesome death. While Mark becomes the lynchpin to keep it all together, events
can unfold without him, having a drastic effect on how the film is watched.
Every character introduced not only stands out but many get central focus for
many minutes, and as a result, you get plenty of incredibly memorable sequences
but also an unpredictable tone, all whilst they find themselves interconnecting
into each other's lives or uncovering strange pockets into their world.
There are plenty of moments in Inferno that stand out, all of which
interconnect under this loose plot completely seamlessly. You begin the film
with a standout and elaborate underwater sequence in a submerged room and it
gets better from there, beginning the movie with an appropriate sense of
anything being possible. Since this is a Dario
Argento film the murder sequences are extremely stylish and heightened, but
since Suspiria was a supernatural
horror film, its sequel follows in the unconventional and fantastical mixed
with symbolism from his down-to-earth giallo thrillers. Not only do you have
the Grand Guignol of the more conventional murder sequences, brutal and
unsettling, but also you have sequences like people being savaged by cats or
eaten to death by rats, all of which manages to be both beautiful but utterly
foul and horrific, only with the issue that, whilst not showing actual animal
cruelty, these scenes especially with the cats need to be warned about for
certain viewers. Unlike other Italian genre films which come off as cheesy,
even if adored by myself, Argento's
from this era still sting when it comes to depicting the deaths, and the morbid
nature around his films in general has retained potency from this.
%20a.jpg)
With Inferno, you have the same heightened tone that is shared with Suspiria, very artificial set around an
elaborate apartment complex where the evil is centred yet fully immersive at
the same time. Genre filmmaking should effortlessly flow. It should use its
narrative to lead the viewer through a journey, especially if the film is
entertainment first, having the virtue of effecting a viewer's emotions
directly if done well. I have changed my mind and contradicted this only
because this statement can be challenged as subjective, and because the films
that fail I have grown to appreciate and find their own logic with, but with
those striving for the best of genre tropes, this is an ideal worth trying to achieve
even if you fail. One of the best virtues of the Italian genre films in their
heyday was their dreamy tones which allowed one to accept the irrational, thus
avoiding distractions of logic in semblance to the real world that break the
visage. Cinema is inherently an unrealistic medium, and unless one attempts to
be as realistic as possible, it should negate the stumbles and falters as much
as possible that take place when exposition and plotting block the steady flow
of time. Inferno does not attempt to
fully explain what is going on but this is for the better, as a quick witted
viewer can build up enough from what they see onscreen and instead worry about
the labyrinth of turns and abrupt ends that takes place for the characters, as
much a film about travelling through various layers as one finds out the
apartment complex has secret pipes and entrances within itself. Various strands
from petty greed to the Three Mothers mythos interlink tentatively, and as
various memorable casting choices like Nicolodi and Alida Valli pass onscreen, the film is able to work as a tense,
eerily aired horror movie whilst ditching anything that would drag the film
down into a mere plod.
Suspiria itself was an exceptional film just for how its use of
colour and lighting took the viewer into a supernatural world, which left a
huge task in attempting to match it, but Inferno's
aesthetic manages to go even further in some ways by becoming even more
coloured and bold in its look. This would one of the last things the great
director Mario Bava worked on before
his death, behind the optical and visual effects, and in many ways, as a tip of
the hat from Argento to the innovator
who helped build the Italian genre industry, this film reflects the bold
colours of his work like Blood and Black
Lace (1964) incredibly. Like Suspiria,
terror is not just to be found in the darkness but in colour itself, at their
brightest and lurid during the most unsettling incidents. With Argento's work during his golden period,
the colour saturation (or lack of colour as in Tenebrae (1981) fully envelops and becomes one with the haunted
moods of his films.
Instead of Goblin, the music changed for this film, with Keith Emerson from the prog band Emerson, Lake and Palmer as composer. That band is an acquired
taste, but Emerson's film scoring
career is a cult following still waiting to happen - alongside Inferno you have the notorious anime
blockbuster Harmagedon (1983), Nighthawks (1981) with Sylvester Stallone and Rutger Hauer, and Godzilla: Final Wars (2004) amongst other films. While many of
these films are not available in the UK, it is not surprising that prog rock
fans can buy a compilation of Emerson's
scores, the one for Inferno a great
addition to Argento's musical canon
by itself. Far more hysterical and on the cusp of absurdity with its choral
chanting than the Goblin score for Suspiria, it helps push the
irrationality of the film further with its alarmed, drastic tone, whilst
allowing this to have its own personality in contrast to its predecessor.
%20b.jpg)
Head to head with Suspiria, Inferno is Argento's most unconventional film, Inferno especially rejecting the plot
heavy narratives that his giallos tend to have completely, and even Suspiria had for its phantasmagoric
content. It follows a logic of its own that drifts between various characters
and never gives priority over any specific one, Mark Elliot merely a grounded
figure for the events happening to circle around. It is a filmic world where
one can go to a library in Rome and, going downstairs, find oneself in an
alchemist's laboratory fully of boiling paste for book binding. It is a film
where events such as a total eclipse suddenly happens only to disappear, or the
fact that there is a hot dog vendor out near a sewage pipe in the middle of the
night, making only any sense in that they are as inclined to kill potential
patrons as they are likely not getting many customers in their chosen spot; I
do not complain about this sudden inclusion and abrupt end to such sights
because the canvas of the film allows the moment to soak in regardless. So much
more terrifying in films for me, like in Suspiria,
is irrationality, where deaths can happen abruptly or events happen without being
signposted, and as this desired template stands, Inferno is one of the strongest examples.
Inferno is one of my favourite films. I accept that it is one where
the plot can be seen full of holes, but you have a scene where someone is
terrorised as the lights keep going on and off in their apartment, a classic
piece on the vinyl player stopping and starting to the power cuts, and the
sense of absolute dread it can produce, and you see the skill that came into Argento's work. The mythos built here
helps give the film a greater atmosphere, building up a background that fills
in what is not dealt with, and also never becomes the main crux of the
production, something which has plagued storytelling in various genres when needing
to elaborate on it more and more per sequel. There is the contentious issue of Mother of Tears, which is a film I wish
to return to as its own creation, part of the completely contentious issue in
its own right of Argento's films post 2000s in general. It cannot ruin the two
films which came before regardless of what I come view it as, but just
emphasises how they both were exceptional productions, Inferno an experience where, unlike a rollercoaster, everything
presented onscreen is felt.
Every death is painful, every
jolt is startling, but the moments of quietness are just as effective. The
scene with the ants crawling in an apartment is a clue but feel like a nod of
iconography from surrealist art even if by accident, and absurd scenes like
death by rats have a phantasmagoric ickiness to them that is still effecting.
Rather than coming away from Inferno
as another horror film padded out with attempts to rationalise everything, the
completely lack of this adds to its mystique, leaving it at the end with the
same level of intensity felt as with Suspiria.
Together the duo is an incredible example of Italian horror cinema. Debating for
myself which is the better film is a painful thing to consider, especially as Inferno really became a film I adored
even beyond Dario Argento as a
filmmaker.
Abstract Spectrum: Fantastique/Psychotronic
Abstract Rating (High/Medium/Low/None): High